1.6 VS Source

fuseku · Post by **fuseku** » Tue Apr 05, 2005 2:13 am

Vote away. <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... /smile.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':)\' />

Personally I prefer 1.6. <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... /happy.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\'^_^\' />

wondersie · Post by **wondersie** » Sat May 14, 2005 4:47 pm

Source has nice graphics... and thats all its got. <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... /smile.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':)\' />

audio · Post by **audio** » Tue Jun 14, 2005 11:04 pm

1.6 > Source

Kobra · Post by **Kobra** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 6:23 pm

From what I can see, Source is basically Counter-Strike with better graphics.. How is 1.6 better?

Sp3culuM · Post by **Sp3culuM** » Fri Jun 17, 2005 9:46 pm

That's what the typical player says, Kobra. Source is aimed at the kids who want to spend daddies money on a new game. I've played source, and I have to say.. it's not my cup of tea. It is NOT 1.6 with better graphics, it's an entirely new game, just built on the same principle.

CS has had a massive community for quite some time, but the game's now about 5-6 years old. Valve needed to release a new game to keep the community interested (as well as boost profits again). Thing is, half of the community love source, because they think it's the way forward for professional competition. The other half love 1.6 because source has many, many bugs that need fixing.

If source is to win over the rest of the community, it needs more changes to keep up with the competitive aspect of the game. I can't see myself switching to source until those changes have been made <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... /smile.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':)\' />

Kobra · Post by **Kobra** » Sun Jun 19, 2005 5:06 pm

I've played Source too.. I don't mind 1.6 or Source. I just don't have either of the games anymore <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... #>/cry.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':(\' />

Michael · Post by **Michael** » Sat Nov 04, 2006 7:52 pm

1.6 ftw cuz i can shoot in it <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... >/blum.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' />

Michael · Post by **Michael** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 12:37 pm

well after playing both for a while it doesnt matter.....source=easyer headshots and lotsa money for me at lans <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... >/blum.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':P\' /> and 1.6 is jus low set graphix but fun yet both still have freaking noob hackers <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... >/lazy.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\'-_-\' /> nehow dun matter i prefer both cuz they the same sept ones easyer and has better graphix

YewNork · Post by **YewNork** » Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:27 pm

For those who think Source is the coolsauce.. Your bad <img src=\'http://www.killanet.net/forum3/public/s ... /smile.gif\' class=\'bbc_emoticon\' alt=\':)\' />.. Source was meant for the people who can't play 1.6.. Cause in all reality.. 1.6 takes skill to play.. Were as in Source.. Like Micheal said... Way to easy HS.. and the dynamic price change is bogus.

Yew

Electrix · Post by **Electrix** » Fri Feb 02, 2007 10:59 pm

1.6 > source. debate over.